4.7 Article

Development of flow injection spectrophotometric methods for the determination of free available chlorine and total available chlorine: comparative study

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 537, Issue 1-2, Pages 197-206

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.01.002

Keywords

free available chlorine; total available chlorine; spectrophotometric reagents; flow injection analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative study on the development of flow-injection (FI) spectrophotometric methods for the determination of free available chlorine (FAC) and total available chlorine (TAC) is described. The use of o-dianisidine (ODS), 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate (ABTS), 4-nitrophenylhydrazine (4-NPH), methyl orange (MO), syringaldazine (SYR) and a new reagent, indigo carmine (1C), in a flow-injection set-up was optimized for common FI operating parameters such as carrier composition, flow-rate, pH, length of reaction coil and injection volume. The FI conditions were designed by the choice of acid at suitable concentration in the carrier stream such that response from FAC is maximized while at the same time minimally interfered by combined available chlorine (CAC). Analytical characteristics of the FI method using these reagents such as detection limits, linear range, selectivity and their relative stability were compared and contrasted. The reagent that yielded the most sensitive signal is ABTS and is least interfered by Mn2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ but interference from CAC was the most severe, while SYR and 4-NPH were least affected by CAC. IC exhibited the best selectivity characteristics amongst all the reagents studied. TAC can be conveniently determined by adding NaBr to the carrier stream. Finally, some of the promising reagents were applied to the analysis of a few commercial disinfecting formulations. Good agreement on the TAC (FAC + CAC) content was found between the proposed FIA and the manual iodimetric methods. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available