4.7 Article

In vivo characterization of the integrin β3 as a receptor for Hantaan virus cellular entry

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 121-127

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/emm.2005.16

Keywords

Hantaan virus; integrin beta(3); integrin beta(1); receptor; viral entry

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL40387] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Binding of viruses to cell surface molecules is an essential step in viral infection. In vitro studies suggested that the alpha(v)beta(3) integrin receptor is the epithelial cell receptor for Hantaan virus (HTNV). Whether beta(3) iS in vivo the only or central cellular receptor for HTNV infection is not known. To investigate the role of beta(3) integrin for cellular entry of HTNV, we established an HTNV infection model in newborn murine pups. Infected pups died at an average age of 14.2 +/- 1.1 days with high levels of viral antigen detected in their brain, lung, and kidney. Pre-injection of blocking monoclonal antibodies (mAb) specific for either beta(3) or alpha(v) prolonged survival significantly to a maximal average survival of 19.7 +/- 11- 1.5 days (P < 0.01) and 18.4 +/- 0.9 days (P < 0.01), respectively. XT-199, a chemical blocker of the alpha(v)beta(3) receptor also prolonged survival to 19.5 +/- 1.3 days (P < 0.01). In contrast to these receptor blockades, anti-HTNV antibody was, not only able to prolong survival, but 20 % of infected pups achieved longterm survival. An anti-murine beta(1) antibody comparatively prolonged survival (19.0 +/- 1.2 days), suggesting that HTNV infection is partly mediated through integrin P, receptors as well as through beta(3) receptors in vivo. Our data demonstrate that the beta(3) receptor is important for HTNV infection in vivo, but also suggest that HTNV may utilize additional receptors beyond 03 for cellular entry within an organism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available