Journal
JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages RC15-RC17Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/BF03347215
Keywords
calcium; serum albumin; hypercalcemia
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Hypercalcemia is ideally detected by the measurement of serum ionised calcium. Because this is not widely available, in common clinical practice albumin-corrected calcium values are often utilized. Our study investigated whether the method used to measure serum albumin concentration may significantly interfere in the derived serum calcium values and, consequently, in the identification of hypercalcemic patients. In 170 consecutive patients admitted to our Department of Internal Medicine we measured serum total calcium, total protein, and albumin by colorimetric method; albumin concentration was also derived by electrophoresis assessment. After correcting serum calcium for colorimetrically (CA) and electrophoretically (EA) measured albumin values, the detected frequencies of hypercalcemia were compared, utilizing different cut-off limits (i.e. 11.0, 10.4 and 10.2 mg/dl). In our patients, the CA values were significantly lower than EA levels. As a consequence, EA-corrected calcium, as well as total calcium concentration were significantly lower than CA-corrected values. This may also account for the very different prevalence of hypercalcemic patients identified by serum total, EA-corrected and CA-corrected calcium values. Our data therefore indicate the importance of the method of albumin measurement in the determination of corrected calcium concentration.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available