4.7 Article

Effect of pramlintide on satiety and food intake in obese subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes

Journal

DIABETOLOGIA
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 838-848

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-005-1732-4

Keywords

amylin; hunger; obesity; peptide hormones; satiety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims/hypothesis: Long-term trials in insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes have shown that adjunctive treatment with the amylin analogue pramlintide reduces HbA(1)c levels and elicits weight loss. While amylin reduces food intake in rodents, pramlintide's effect on satiety and food intake in humans has not yet been assessed. Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, 11 insulin-treated men with type 2 diabetes (age 60 +/- 9 years, BMI 28.9 +/- 4.8 kg/m(2)) and 15 nondiabetic obese men (age 41 +/- 21 years, BMI 34.4 +/- 4.5 kg/m(2)) underwent two standardised meal tests. After fasting overnight, subjects received single subcutaneous injections of either pramlintide (120 mu g) or placebo, followed by a pre-load meal. After 1 h, subjects ate an ad libitum buffet meal. Energy intake and meal duration were measured, as were hunger ratings ( using visual analogue scales), and plasma cholecystokinin, glucagon-like peptide-1 and peptide YY concentrations over time. Results: Compared with placebo, pramlintide reduced energy intake in both the type 2 diabetes (Delta-202 +/- 64 kcal, -23 +/- 8%, p < 0.01) and obese (Delta-170 +/- 68 kcal, -16 +/- 6%, p < 0.02) groups, without affecting meal duration. Hunger and hormonal analyte profiles provided evidence that pramlintide may exert a primary satiogenic effect, independently of other anorexigenic gut peptides. Conclusions/interpretation: The results indicate that enhanced satiety and reduced food intake may explain the weight loss observed in long-term pramlintide trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available