4.8 Article

Stable immobilization of rat hepatocyte spheroids on galactosylated nanofiber scaffold

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 26, Issue 15, Pages 2537-2547

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.040

Keywords

cell morphology; electrospinning; function maintenance; galactosylated surface; hepatocyte; nanofiber scaffold; spheroid culture; surface grafting polymerization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary rat hepatocytes self-assemble into multi-cellular spheroids and maintain differentiated functions when cultured on a two-dimensional (2-D) substrate conjugated with galactose ligand. The aim of this study is to investigate how a functional nanofiber scaffold with surface-galactose ligand influences the attachment, spheroid formation and functional maintenance of rat hepatocytes in culture, as compared with the functional 2-D substrate. Highly porous nanofiber scaffolds comprising of fibers with an average diameter of 760 nm were prepared by electrospinning of poly(epsilon-caprolactone-co-ethyl ethylene phosphate) (PCLEEP), a novel biodegradable copolymer. Galactose ligand with a density of 66 nmol/cm(2) was achieved on the nanofiber scaffold via covalent conjugation to a poly(acrylic acid) spacer UV-grafted onto the fiber surface. Hepatocytes cultured on the galactosylated PCLEEP nanofiber scaffold exhibited similar functional profiles in terms of cell attachment, ammonia metabolism, albumin secretion and cytochrome P450 enzymatic activity as those on the functional 2-D substrate, although their morphologies are different. Hepatocytes cultured on galactosylated PCLEEP film formed 50-300 mum spheroids that easily detached from surface upon agitation, whereas hepatocytes cultured on galactosylated nanofiber scaffold formed smaller aggregates of 20-100 mum that engulfed the functional nanofibers, resulting in an integrated spheroid-nanofiber construct. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available