4.5 Article

Risperidone-induced action potential prolongation is attenuated by increased repolarization reserve due to concomitant block of ICa,L

Journal

NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 371, Issue 5, Pages 393-400

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-005-1063-5

Keywords

antipsychotic drugs; acquired long QT; repolarisation reserve; membrane currents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The neuroleptic risperidone is an effective blocker of the rapidly activating component of the delayed rectifier current (I-Kr) and hence is expected to prolong cardiac action potential duration (APD). However, unlike with other typical I-Kr blockers we failed to demonstrate a marked prolongation of late repolarization with risperidone. It is hypothesized that the APD-prolonging effect of risperidone is masked by the high repolarization reserve due to the prominent delayed rectifier currents I-Kr and I-Ks in guinea pig papillary muscle. Action potentials and force of contraction were recorded in isolated guinea pig papillary muscles. L-type calcium current I-Ca,I-L and I-Kr were measured using the standard patch clamp technique in single ventricular cardiomyocytes. Reduction of the repolarization reserve by the blocking of I-Ks with chromanol 239B augmented the effect of the selective I-Kr blocker E-4031, but not of risperidone, although both drugs completely blocked I-Kr. In contrast to E-4031 risperidone markedly reduced the force of contraction due to the partial blocking of I-Ca,I-L in the same concentration range as required for block of I-Kr. Reduction of the repolarization reserve by the blocking of I-Ks cannot exacerbate the APD-prolonging effect of risperidone. However, even incomplete concomitant blocking of I-Ca,I-L attenuates the APD-prolonging effect of the complete blocking of I-Kr. This behaviour may explain the small APD-prolonging effect of risperidone despite the drug's robust blocking of I-Kr.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available