4.7 Article

A possible formation scenario for the ultramassive cluster W3 in NGC 7252

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 359, Issue 1, Pages 223-227

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08891.x

Keywords

methods : N-body simulations; galaxies : dwarfs; galaxies : formation; galaxies : individual : NGC 7252; galaxies : interactions; galaxies : star clusters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intermediate age star cluster W3 (age approximate to 300-500 Myr) in NGC 7252 is the most luminous star cluster known to date with a dynamical mass estimate of 8 +/- 2 x 10(7) M-.. With an effective radius of about 17.5 pc and a velocity dispersion of 45 km s(-1) this object may be viewed as one of the recently discovered ultracompact dwarf galaxies (UCDs). Its intermediate age, however, precludes an origin as a stripped nucleated dwarf elliptical galaxy. The galaxy NGC 7252 is a merger remnant from two gas-rich disc galaxies. Interactions between two gas-rich galaxies lead to bursts of intense star formation. The age of the interaction and the age of W3 are in good agreement, suggesting that W3 was probably formed in the starburst. We propose a formation scenario for W3. Observations of interacting galaxies reveal regions of strong star formation forming from dozens up to hundreds of star clusters in confined regions of up to several hundred parsecs in diameter. The total mass of new stars in these regions can reach 10(7) or even 10(8) M-.. By means of numerical simulations we have shown that the star clusters in these regions merge on short time-scales of a few Myr up to a few hundred Myr. We apply this scenario to W3 and predict properties which could be observable and the future evolution of this object. This work lends credence to the notion that at least some of the UCDs may be evolved star cluster complexes formed during early hierarchical mergers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available