4.3 Article

The influence of different unloading positions upon stature recovery and paraspinal muscle activity

Journal

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 365-371

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.11.003

Keywords

chronic low-back pain; spinal shrinkage; paraspinal muscle activity; electromyography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To determine whether stature recovery and paraspinal muscle activity can be altered in individuals with and without chronic low-back pain by assuming different unloading positions. Design. A case-control study considering the effects of unloading position on stature recovery in individuals with and without chronic low-back pain. Background. Stature recovery has been documented to be lower in individuals with chronic low-back pain. Elevated paraspinal muscle activity subjects the spine to increased compression, which may delay stature recovery. However, the mechanism(s) causing prolonged stature recovery are yet to be explored. Methods. Eleven chronic low-back pain participants (age 33 yr (SD 12.2), height 1.72 m (SD 0.08), body mass 75.9 kg (SD 10.7)) and eleven asymptomatic participants (age 30.5 yr (SD 9.7), height 1.75 m (SD 0.10), body mass 73.3 kg (SD 11.7)) performed a loaded walking task (10% body mass) and adopted four unloading positions on separate occasions. Measurements of stature and muscle activity were recorded during each position. Findings. Individuals with chronic low-back pain exhibited higher paraspinal EMG and delayed stature recovery in all positions (P < 0.05). Both groups experienced greatest stature recovery and least muscle activity during gravity inversion (P < 0.05). Interpretation. Elevated muscle activity was found in the chronic low-back pain group supporting the existence of this explanation for delayed stature recovery. The gravity inverted position resulted in the lowest EMG and the greatest stature recovery. Further research is required to determine whether improving stature recovery has clinical implications by reducing pain/disability. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available