4.3 Article

Antibody- and complement-independent phagocytotic and cytolytic activities of human macrophages toward porcine cells

Journal

XENOTRANSPLANTATION
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 181-188

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2005.00222.x

Keywords

cytolysis; human macrophage; phagocytosis; porcine red blood cell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It has been speculated that host macrophages contribute to rapid clearance of transplanted xenogeneic cells. To address such a possibility, phagocytotic and cytolytic activities of human macrophages toward xenogeneic porcine cells were evaluated in vitro in the absence of antibodies and complement factors. Methods: Human peripheral monocyte-derived macrophages (P-macrophages) and reticulo-endothelial macrophages (RE-macrophages) were obtained from volunteers' peripheral blood and from the perfusion effluents of liver allografts for transplantation, respectively. 5-(and 6-) carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labeled human autologous red blood cells (auto-RBCs), ABO-incompatible RBCs (incom-RBCs) and xenogeneic porcine RBCs (xeno-RBCs) were incubated with the human macrophages; subsequently, the macrophages that had phagocytosed the RBCs could be identified as CFSE positive cells by FCM analyses and confocal microscopy. Cytolytic activity was quantified by calculating levels of lactate dehydrogenase in each culture supernatant. Results: Human RE-macrophages spontaneously phagocytosed and had a remarkable cytolytic activity toward xeno-RBCs, but not toward auto-RBCs or incom-RBCs. Elimination of alpha-galactosyl xenoantigen (alpha-Gal) epitopes on xeno-RBCs did not prevent phagocytotic or cytolytic activity of RE-macrophages. Conclusions: These findings indicate phagocytotic and cytolitic activities of human macrophages toward porcine cells are initiated by a factor other than alpha-Gal in a mechanism independent of antibody/complement opsonization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available