4.7 Article

Oxidation of combined ingestion of glucose and sucrose during exercise

Journal

METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 610-618

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.12.004

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first purpose of the study was to examine whether combined ingestion of glucose and sucrose at an intake rate of 1.2 g/min would lead to higher oxidation rates compared with the ingestion of an isocaloric amount of glucose or sucrose alone. The second aim of the study was to investigate whether a mixture of glucose and sucrose when ingested at a high rate (2.4 g/min) would result in exogenous CHO oxidation rates higher than 1.2 to 1.3 g/min. Eight trained cyclists (maximal oxygen consumption: 64 +/- 2 mL (.) kg(-1) min(-1) mean +/- SE) performed 5 exercise trials in random order. Each trial consisted of 120 minutes of cycling at 50% maximum power output (63% +/- 2% maximal oxygen consumption), whereas subjects received a solution providing either 1.2 g/min of glucose (GLU), 1.2 g/min of sucrose (SUC), 0.6 g/min of glucose + 0.6 g/min of sucrose (M-GLU+SUC), 1.2 g/min of glucose + 1.2 g/min of sucrose (H-GLU+SUC), or water (WAT). Peak exogenous CHO oxidation rates in the H-GLU+SUC trial (1.20 0.07 g/min) were significantly higher (P <.01) compared with the GLU, M-GLU+SUC, and SUC trials (0.77 +/- 0.04, 0.90 +/- 0.07, 0.98 +/- 0.04 g/min, respectively). Furthermore, peak exogenous CHO rates in M-GLU+SUC and SUC trials were significantly higher (P <.05) compared with the GLU trial. In conclusion, combined ingestion of moderate amounts of glucose and sucrose (144 g) during cycling exercise resulted in approximately 21% higher exogenous CHO oxidation rates compared with the ingestion of an isocaloric amount of glucose. Furthermore, when a mixture of glucose and sucrose was ingested at high rates (2.4 g/min), exogenous CHO oxidation rates reached peak values of approximately 1.20 g/min. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available