4.7 Article

Comparative studies of oil compositions produced from sawdust, rice husk, lignin and cellulose by hydrothermal treatment

Journal

FUEL
Volume 84, Issue 7-8, Pages 875-884

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.01.004

Keywords

sawdust; rice husk; lignin; cellulose; hydrothermal process

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study is to investigate the distribution of products, i.e. liquid, gas and solid from wood (sawdust) and non-wood biomass (rice husk), and major biomass components, i.e. lignin, cellulose produced by hydrothermal treatment (280 degrees C for 15 min) and analysis of liquid hydrocarbons (oils) for the differences in the hydrocarbon composition with respect to feed material. Cellulose showed the highest conversion among the four samples investigated in the present study. Sawdust and rice husk has almost similar conversions. Liquid products were recovered with various solvents (ether, acetone, and ethyl acetate) and analyzed by GC-MS. The oil (ether extract) from the hydrothermal treatment of cellulose consisted of furan derivatives whereas lignin-derived oil contained phenolic compounds. The compositions of oils (ether extract) from sawdust and rice husk contained both phenolic compounds and furans, however phenolic compounds were dominant. Rice husk derived oil consists of more benzenediols than sawdust derived oil. The volatility distribution of oxygenated hydrocarbons were carried out by GNP gram and it showed that the majority of oxygenated hydrocarbons from sawdust, rice husk and lignin were distributed at n-C-11, whereas they were distributed at n-C-8 and n-C-10 in cellulose-derived oil. The gaseous products were carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane in sawdust, rice husk, lignin and cellulose. In addition to this, ethylene, ethane and propane were observed for sawdust, rice husk and lignin. The major gas product was carbon dioxide for all samples. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available