3.8 Article

Women's perceptions of reproductive health in three communities around Beirut, Lebanon

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS
Volume 13, Issue 25, Pages 34-42

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(05)25170-4

Keywords

reproductive health; socio-economic status; migrants; refugees; women's status; Lebanon

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [074986] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to elicit definitions of the concept of reproductive health among women in three communities around Beirut, Lebanon, as part of the reproductive health component of a larger Urban Health Study The communities were characterised by poverty, rurol-urbon mobility and heterogeneous refugee and migrant populations. A random sample of 71869 women of reproductive age completed a questionnaire, of whom a sub-sample of 207 women were randomly selected. The women's understanding of good reproductive health included three major themes, which were expressed differently in the three communities. Their understanding included good physical and mental health, and underscored the need for activities promoting health. Their ability to reproduce and raise children, practise family planning and birth spacing, and go through pregnancy and motherhood safely were central to their reproductive duties and their social status. Finally, they saw reproductive health within the context of economic status, good marital relations and strength to cope with their lives. These findings point to the need to situate interventions in the life course of women, their health and that of their husbands and families; the importance of reproduction not only from a health services point of view, but also as regards women's roles and responsibilities within marriage and their families; and taking account of the harsh socio-economic conditions in their communities. (c) 2005 Reproductive Health Matters. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available