4.3 Article

Effects of mechanical strain on proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow stromal cell line ST2

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 219-225

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00774-004-0587-y

Keywords

mechanical strain; bone marrow stromal cell; ST2; Cbfa1/Runx2; real-time PCR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells into osteoblasts is regulated by many factors including growth factors, cytokines, and hormones. Mechanical stress has been considered to be an important factor in bone modeling and remodeling. However, biological responses of stromal cells to mechanical stimuli are still unknown. To show the correlation between magnitude of mechanical strain and differentiation of stromal cells into osteoblasts, we investigated the proliferation and the expression of osteoblastrelated genes in stromal cell line ST2 that is in the process of osteoblastic differentiation by treatment with ascorbic acid and beta-glycerophosphate, under 0.8% - 15% elongation using the Flexercell Strain system. The expression of osteoblastrelated genes was analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Cell proliferation significantly increased at 5%, 10%, and 15% elongation compared to that of unloaded controls. Alkaline phosphatase (ALPase) activity significantly increased at 0.8% and 5% elongation but decreased at 10% and 15% elongation. At 1h and 6h, mRNA level of Cbfa1/Runx2 increased at lower magnitudes of strain ( 0.8% and 5% elongation) but decreased at higher magnitude of strain ( 15% elongation). At 24 and 48h, Cbfa1/Runx2 and osteocalcin mRNAs decreased at 5%, 10%, and 15% elongation, whereas cell proliferation and expression of type I collagen mRNA increased at the same elongation. These results indicate that mechanical strain stimulates osteoblastic differentiation of stromal cells at low magnitudes of strain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available