4.4 Article

Survey of water-extractable phosphorus in livestock manures

Journal

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 701-708

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0099

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water-extractable P (WEP) in manure is increasingly used as an environmental indicator as it is correlated with P in runoff from soils recently amended with manure. Little information exists on WEP variability across livestock manures. A survey of 140 livestock manures was conducted to assess trends in WEP (dry weight equivalent) related to livestock types and manure storage. Manure WEP ranged widely (0.2-16.8 g kg(-1)), with swine (Sus scrofa domestica L.) having the highest average concentrations (9.2 g kg(-1)), followed by turkey (Melleagris gallopavo) (6.3 g kg(-1)), layer chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus L.) (4.9 g kg(-1)), dairy cattle (Bos taurus) (4.0 g kg(-1)), broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus L.) (3.2 g kg(-1)), and beef cattle (Bos taurus) (2.3 g kg-1). Manure WEP also differed by general storage system; dry manures contained significantly lower WEP concentrations (3.9 g kg(-1)) than manure from liquid storage systems (5.4 g kg(-1)). Within liquid storages, no significant differences in WEP were observed between covered and uncovered storages or between bottom-loaded and top-loaded storages. Dry-matter (DM) content of manure was weakly correlated to WEP across all manures (r= -0.44), but strongly correlated with WEP in liquid swine manure (r= -0.87) and dairy manure (r= -0.72), suggesting dissolution of phosphate compounds as manure solids are diluted in storage. Varying positive correlations were observed between WEP in manure and water-extractable Ca, Mg, and Fe, or total P, depending on livestock category. Results of this study show that livestock manure can be categorized by WEP, a key step toward differential weighting of agricultural P sources in P site assessment indices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available