4.5 Article

Decreased incidence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease and fewer hemostatic derangements associated with intravenous busulfan vs oral busulfan in adults conditioned with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Journal

ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages 321-330

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-004-0982-4

Keywords

hepatic VOD; allogeneic BMT; busulfan; oral; intravenous

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the occurrence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in 241 adults conditioned with busulan + cyclophosphamide at a single institute and retrospectively compared 186 patients who received oral busulfan (O-Bu group) with 55 patients who received intravenous busulfan (I-Bu group). Various hemostatic parameters were determined at baseline and on days 0, 7, 14, and 21. Hepatic VOD occurred in 41.7% of the O-Bu group and in 18.5% of the I-Bu group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the I-Bu group had significantly decreased risk of VOD compared to the O-Bu group [p = 0.006, odds ratio: (OR) 0.345]. Eleven patients in the O-Bu group and none of the I-Bu group developed severe VOD. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a between-subjects factor revealed significant differences in post-transplant levels of antithrombin III, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), and D-dimer according to the occurrence of VOD. The level of antithrombin III was significantly lower, whereas the level of D-dimer was significantly higher, in the O-Bu group than in the I-Bu group. These findings show that, in adults conditioned with busulfan + cyclophosphamide, intravenous busulfan was associated with significantly decreased incidence of VOD and fewer hemostatic derangements after allogeneic BMT compared to oral busulfan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available