4.7 Article

Ex vivo culture of Fancc-/- stem/progenitor cells predisposes cells to undergo apoptosis, and surviving stem/progenitor cells display cytogenetic abnormalities and an increased risk of malignancy

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages 3465-3471

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2483

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U01 CA84221] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL63219, P01 HL53586, T32 HL-07910, K08 HLDK 040071-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30DK49218] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current strategies for genetic therapy using Moloney retroviruses require ex vivo manipulation of hematopoietic cells to facilitate stable integration of the transgene. While many studies have evaluated the impact of ex vivo culture on normal murine and human stem/progenitor cells, the cellular consequences of ex vivo manipulation of stem cells with intrinsic defects in genome stability are incompletely understood. Here we show that ex vivo culture of Fancc(-/-) bone marrow cells results in a time-dependent increase in apoptosis of primitive Fancc(-/-) progenitor cells in conditions that promote the proliferation of wild-type stem/progenitor cells. Further, recipients reconstituted with the surviving Fancc(-/-) cells have a high incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities and myelold malignancies that are associated with an acquired resistance to tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). Collectively, these data indicate that the intrinsic defects in the genomic stability of Fancc(-/-) stem/progenitor cells provide a selective pressure for cells that are resistant to apoptosis and have a propensity for the evolution to clonal hematopolesis and malignancy. These studies could have implications for the design of genetic therapies for treatment of Fanconi anemia and potentially other genetic diseases with intrinsic defects in genome stability. (c) 2005 by The American Society of Hematology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available