4.5 Article

Decreased firing frequency of midbrain dopamine neurons in mice lacking mu opioid receptors

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 2883-2886

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04123.x

Keywords

addiction; dopaminergic; electrophysiology; impulse activity; reward

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA-09040, DA-15537] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dopamine neurons originating in the midbrain and projecting to cortico-limbic and motor structures are one of the major neuronal substrates implicated in the reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse. The output of this system is largely determined by its impulse activity (amount and pattern of firing activity). Several intrinsic and synaptic factors can influence dopamine neuronal activity and, consequently, addiction liability. Pharmacological studies indicate that mu-opioid receptors and their activation by endogenous opioids may play an important role. In the present study, we use a genetic approach to better understand the role of mu-opioid receptors in modulating dopamine neuronal activity in vivo. Using in vivo extracellular single-unit recordings, we show that mice lacking mu-opioid receptors exhibit lower firing rates of dopamine neurons compared with their wild-type littermates. Although we observed no overall changes in bursting activity compared with wild-type mice, animals lacking mu-opioid receptors exhibited a higher proportion of regular-spiking cells that lacked bursting activity. These findings are the first to emphasize the critical role of mu-opioid receptors in modulating action potential output of dopamine neurons in vivo using a genetic approach. They also provide a possible underlying mechanism for the decreased reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse that was previously observed in mice lacking mu-opioid receptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available