4.6 Article

Standardizing questionnaire items for the assessment of waterpipe tobacco use in epidemiological studies

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages 400-404

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.08.002

Keywords

waterpipe smoking; tobacco; cigarette; epidemology; waterpipe; smoking; Syria

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [R01 TW05962, R21 TW006545] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lessons from surveillance of the smoking epidemic show that the lack of adequate attention to standardizing measures and instruments for epidemiological studies has negatively influenced our ability to assess spatial and secular trends in smoking worldwide. Waterpipe smoking, another hazardous form of tobacco use, is gaining popularity worldwide, with societies in the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR) being most affected. Several research groups are currently investigating the epidemiology of waterpipe smoking among various populations in the EMR. Initial evidence shows that in contrast to usage patterns observed in adult cigarette smoking, waterpipe smoking is characterized mainly by intermittent and social use. As such, many measures that have been traditionally used for the study of usage patterns and dependence among adult cigarette smokers are uninformative for waterpipe smoking. Thus, the need to develop standardized measures and terminology for assessment of the epidemiology of waterpipe smoking in different populations is of paramount importance. As the monitoring of waterpipe smoking is in its infancy, the development of consensus measures should facilitate the initiation of effective surveillance that can guide public health response to this emerging epidemic. (c) 2004 The Royal Institute of Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available