4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Does vaginal closure force differ in the supine and standing positions?

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 192, Issue 5, Pages 1722-1728

Publisher

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.050

Keywords

pelvic floor; posture; levator uni; vaginal closure force

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD038665-04, R01 HD038665-05, P50 HD044406-01, R01 HD041123-04, R01 HD 38665, R01 HD038665-01, R01 HD041123-01, R01 HD038665-03, P50 HD044406-010002, R01HD38665-05, P50 HD044406-02, P50 HD044406-03, P50 HD44406, R01 HD038665-02, R01 HD041123-03, R01 HD041123-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study was undertaken to quantify resting vaginal closure force (VCFREST), maximum vaginal closure force (VCFMAX), and augmentation of vaginal closure force augmentation (VCFAUG) when supine and standing and to determine whether the change in intra-abdominal pressure associated with change in posture accounts for differences in VCF. Study design: Thirty-nine asymptomatic, continent women were recruited to determine, when supine and standing, the vaginal closure force (eg, the force closing the vagina in the mid-sagittal plane) and bladder pressures at rest and at maximal voluntary contraction. VCF was measured with an instrumented vaginal speculum and bladder pressure was determined with a microtip catheter. VCFREST was the resting pelvic floor tone, and VCFMAX was the peak pelvic floor force during a maximal voluntary contraction. VCFAUG was the difference between VCFMAX and VCF (REST). T tests and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for analysis. Results: VCFREST when supine was 3.6 +/- 0.8 N and when standing was 6.9 +/- 1.5 N-a 92% difference (P <.001). The VCFMAX when supine was 7.5 +/- 2.9 N and when standing was 10. 1 +/- 2.4 N-a 35% difference (P < .001). Bladder pressure when supine (10.5 +/- 4.7 cm H2O) was significantly less (P < .001) than when standing (31.0 +/- 6.4 cm H2O). The differences in bladder pressure when either supine or standing did not correlate with the corresponding differences in VCF at rest or at maximal voluntary contraction. The supine VCFAUG of 3.9 +/- 2.7 N, was significantly greater than the standing VCFAUG of 3.3 +/- 1.9 N. Conclusion: With change in posture, vaginal closure force increases because of higher intra-abdominal pressure and greater resistance in the pelvic floor muscles. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available