4.5 Article

In vivo determination of optical properties of normal and tumor tissue with white light reflectance and an empirical light transport model during endoscopy -: art. no. 034018

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-INT SOCIETY OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/1.1921907

Keywords

optical properties; photodynamic therapy; reflectance spectroscopy; optical fiber probe; endoscopy; light transport model

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB00224] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determination of tissue optical properties is fundamental for application of light in either therapeutical or diagnostics procedures. In the present work we implemented a spatially resolved steady-state diffuse reflectance method where only two fibers ( one source and one detector) spaced 2.5 mm apart are used for the determination of the optical properties. The method relies on the spectral characteristics of the tissue chromophores ( water, dry tissue, and blood) and the assumption of a simple wavelength dependent expression for the determination of the reduced scattering coefficient. Because of the probe dimensions the method is suited for endoscopic measurements. The method was validated against more traditional models, such as the diffusion theory combined with adding doubling for in vitro measurements of bovine muscle. Mean and standard deviation of the absorption coefficient and the reduced scattering coefficient at 630 nm for normal mucosa were 0.87 +/- 0.22 cm(-1) and 7.8 +/- 62.3 cm(-1), respectively. Cancerous mucosa had values 1.87 +/- 1.10 cm(-1) and 8.4 +/- 2.3 cm(-1), respectively. These values are similar to data presented by other authors. Blood perfusion was the main variable accounting for differences in the absorption coefficient between the studied tissues. (c) 2005 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available