4.3 Article

Life history varies with migratory distance in western sandpipers Calidris mauri

Journal

JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 191-202

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03368.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The propensity of migratory waders to remain on the non-breeding grounds during the arctic breeding season (oversummer) in their first biological year of life (juveniles) may be latitude, and thus migratory distance dependent. We compared the extent of preparation for northward migration of western sandpipers Calidris mouri spending the non-breeding season in Mexico and Panama during 1995-1998. During winter residency and premigratory periods, we measured body mass and scored the extent of dull basic versus bright alternate breeding plumage of captured juveniles and adults (second biological year or older), and obtained additional plumage scores from observations of uniquely colour banded birds. Nearly all western sandpipers in Mexico prepared for northward migration by increasing body mass and moulting into breeding Plumage. In Panama. most adults prepared for migration, but few, if any., juveniles did so. Patterns of body mass and breeding plumage development do not generally support the hypothesis that oversummering by juveniles results directly from less efficient foraging or from resource competition with adults. We suggest instead that costs directly associated with migratory distance per se influence the life history strategies of sandpipers spending the non-breeding seasons at different latitudes. This latitudinal difference should interact with the well documented sex-ratio cline in non-breeding distribution (male western sandpipers predominating in northern parts of the range and females in Southern parts). This Suggests that females have more conservative life histories, prioritizing first year survivorship, relative to males that instead weight first-year breeding opportunities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available