4.4 Article

Common genetic changes in hereditary and sporadic pituitary adenomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization

Journal

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 72-82

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20162

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twenty-four pituitary adenomas, both the sporadic type (n 18) and the type arising in association with either multiple endocrine neoplasia, type I (MEN I; n = 2), or Carney complex (CNC, n = 4) were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Twenty-one (88%) tumors displayed chromosomal alterations. The number of chromosomal aberrations in each tumor varied from 2 to greater than 10. Several recurrent chromosomal abnormalities were identified in this study. The most frequently detected losses of chromosomal material involved I p (14 of 24, 58%), 11 p (I I of 24, 46%), 17 (10 of 24, 42%), 16p (9 of 24, 38%), 4 (8 of 24, 33%), 10p (6 of 24, 25%), 12 (6 of 24, 25%), 20 (6 of 24, 25%), 22q (6 of 24, 25%), 13q (5 of 24, 21%), and 9p (4 of 24, 17%). Copy number increases were detected on 4q (7 of 24, 29%), 17 (8 of 24, 33%), 19 (7 of 24, 29%), 1p (6 of 24, 25%), 5 (6 of 24, 25%), 20 (6 of 24, 25%), 6q (5 of 24, 21%), 13q21-qter (5 of 24, 21%), and 16p (5 of 24, 21%). Chromosome I I loss, which involved I I p in all cases, was the most significant finding and was common to tumors arising sporadically and in association with MEN I and CNC. In addition, the majority of the tumors (18 of 24, 75% overall and 86% of all tumors with chromosomal abnormalities) showed involvement of chromosome 1. Tumors had either loss (14 of 24, 58%) or gain (6 of 24, 25%) in the 1p32-1pter region. Finally, changes on chromosome 17, either loss or gain, occurred in 71% (17) of all 24 patients. In summary, all the tumors with chromosomal rearrangements (21 of 24, 88%), whether sporadic pituitary adenomas or those associated with MENI or CNC, had alteration(s) of Ip32, 11p, or 17. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available