4.6 Article

Mixing and entrainment in the Red Sea outflow plume. Part II: Turbulence characteristics

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 584-600

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO2689.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

South of the Strait of Bab el Mandeb, saline Red Sea Water flows downslope into the Gulf of Aden mainly along the narrow 130-km-long Northern Channel (NC) and the shorter and wider Southern Channel (SC). In the NC, the Red Sea plume simultaneously exhibited weak entrainment into a 35-120-m-thick, weakly stratified bottom layer while a 35-285-m-thick interfacial layer above showed signs of vigorous mixing, overturns up to 30 in thick, and extensive zones of gradient Richardson numbers below 1/4. Turbulent overturning scales, or Thorpe scales, are extracted from regular CTD profiles and equated to Ozmidov scales. On this basis, interfacial mixing is quantified in terms of estimated turbulent dissipation rates, vertical turbulent salt flux, and interfacial stress. Even though these estimates are subject to significant uncertainty, they demonstrate the intensity of mixing during strong winter outflow in terms of eddy diffusivities K rho on the order of 10(-2) m(2) s(-1). The large K-rho occur in strong stratification such that vertical turbulent salt fluxes are also large. Along the NC, relative maxima of K-rho correspond to maxima in the bulk Froude number. Direct short-term measurements of the Reynolds stress just above the seafloor at two locations, one in the NC and one in the SC, allow comparisons of the bottom stress tau(b) with the interfacial turbulent stress tau(i). The ratio tau(i)/tau(b) shows large scatter in a small sample, with maximum values on the order of 1. An appendix outlines procedures of making and reducing lowered acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements optimized for observing descending plumes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available