4.6 Article

Preterm delivery in Boston before and after September 11th, 2001

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 323-327

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000158801.04494.52

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R37 HD034568, R01 HD034568, R01 HD034568-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We hypothesized that stress induced by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 might shorten pregnancy. To test this hypothesis, we compared gestational duration and risk of preterm delivery among women who were pregnant on September 11 with women who had delivered before that date. Study Design: We conducted a matched cohort study among pregnant women enrolled in the Boston-based cohort study Project Viva between 1999 and 2001. Each of 606 participants, pregnant on September 11, 2001, was matched to 1 or 2 participants who delivered before that date. Results: Compared with women who delivered before September 11th, women who were pregnant on September 11th had mean gestation length that was 0.13 weeks longer (95% confidence interval = -0.05 to 0.30) and an odds ratio for preterm delivery before 37 weeks' gestation of 0.60 (0.36 to 0.98). Only women exposed in the first trimester had longer gestation. Conclusions: Contrary to expectation, Boston-area women who were pregnant on September 11th had a lower risk of preterm delivery than women who delivered before that date. Although the interpretation of this finding is difficult, it is clear that the acute psychologic stress documented nationwide after the terrorist attacks did not increase the risk of preterm delivery in this population at some distance from the attacks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available