4.7 Article

Respiratory viral infections in patients with chronic, obstructive pulmonary disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 322-330

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.07.011

Keywords

respiratory viral infection; influenza; respiratory syncytial virus; rhinovirus; parainfluenza virus; coronavirus; human metapneumovirus; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; hospitalization; exacerbation

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [N01-AI-15103] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to apply reverse transcription- PCR (RT-PCR) assays to clinical specimens collected from patients with acute respiratory illness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods. One hundred and ninety-four samples from two different study cohorts were analysed using RT-PCR assays for picornaviruses, coronaviruses 229E and OC43, influenza A and B viruses, respiratory syncytial. virus, parainfluenza types 1-3 viruses, and human metapneumovirus and a PCR assay for adenoviruses. The results were added to results obtained previously using cell culture and serologic methods. Results. RT-PCR assays identified an additional 35 respiratory virus- associated illnesses not identified previously by cell culture or serology (n=46). Picornaviruses and coronaviruses were the most common viral infections identified only by RT-PCR. Overall, 41.8% of the acute respiratory illnesses evaluated were associated with a respiratory virus infection, with picornaviruses, coronaviruses and influenza viruses being the most common infections recognized. No human metapneumovirus infections were identified by RT-IPCR assay. Conclusions. Respiratory viral infections are commonly associated with acute respiratory illness in COPD patients, and the use of RT-PCR assays significantly increases the ability to diagnose these infections. (c) 2004 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available