4.3 Article

Response of the intermediate complexity Mars Climate Simulator to different obliquity angles

Journal

PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 659-670

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2004.10.003

Keywords

Mars; Mars climate; Mars atmosphere; climate modelling; atmospheric dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A climate model of intermediate complexity, named the Mars Climate Simulator, has been developed based on the Portable University Model of the Atmosphere (PUMA). The main goal of this new development is to simulate the climate variations on Mars resulting from the changes in orbital parameters and their impact on the layered polar terrains (also known as permanent polar ice caps). As a first step towards transient simulations over several obliquity cycles, the model is applied to simulate the dynamical and thermodynamical response of the Martian climate system to different but fixed obliquity angles. The model is forced by the annual and daily cycle of solar insolation. Experiments have been performed for obliquities of phi = 15 degrees (minimum), phi = 25.2 degrees (present), and phi = 35 degrees (maximum). The resulting changes in solar insolation mainly in the polar regions impact strongly on the cross-equatorial circulation which is driven by the meridional temperature gradient and steered by the Martian topography. At high obliquity, the cross-equatorial near surface flow from the winter to the summer hemisphere is strongly enhanced compared to low obliquity periods. The summer ground temperature ranges from 200 K (phi = 15 degrees) to 250 K (phi = 35') at 80 degrees N in northern summer, and from 220 K (phi = 15 degrees) to 270 K (phi = 35 degrees) at 80 degrees S in southern summer. In the atmosphere at I km above ground, the respective range is 195-225 K in northern summer, and 210-250 K in southern summer. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available