4.5 Article

2-D reactive transport modeling of the fate of CO2 injected into a saline aquifer in the Wabamun Lake Area, Alberta, Canada

Journal

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 10-23

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.08.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Carbon Management Canada Inc. (CMC)
  2. Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy (ISEEE) at the University of Calgary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a viable option to reduce emissions of anthropogenic CO2 into the atmosphere. One important component during the storage site selection process is the prediction of the movement and the fate of the injected CO2 in the chosen reservoir. The fate of CO2 injected into a saline aquifer of the Devonian Nisku Formation in Alberta (Canada) was simulated using the reactive transport code TOUGHREACT. A 2D radially symmetric model was developed for a 50-year CO2 injection phase followed by a 1000-year storage period. CO2 was injected into the bottom 10 m of the Nisku Formation at a rate of 1 Mton/year for 50 years. The injected supercritical CO2 spread out radially up to 3.5 km after 50 years of injection and 6.0 km after 1000 years of post-injection. After 1000 years, the injected CO2 was trapped in the Nisku Formation underneath the excellent seal of the Calmar shale predominantly as free CO2 via hydrodynamic trapping (76%) and to a lesser extent by solubility trapping (23%) in aqueous phase (HCO3- (aq)). Mineral trapping of injected CO2 in the Nisku aquifer was negligible. This study predicted the interactions of the fluids and rock minerals with injected CO2 in the storage Nisku aquifer, the Calmar caprock and the bottom rock Ireton shale. This information will be highly beneficial for potential future CO2 injection projects targeting the saline aquifer of the Nisku Formation in Western Canada. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available