4.4 Article

The magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 259-267

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10806-005-0632-4

Keywords

genetically modified crops; research ethics; research paradigms; specific etiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One common method of criticizing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is to label them as ``magic bullets.'' However, this criticism, like many in the debate over GMOs, is not very clear. What exactly is the ``magic bullet criticism''? What are its origins? What flaw is it pointing out in GM crops and agricultural biotechnology? What is the scope of the criticism? Does it apply to all GMOs, or just some? Does it point to a fatal flaw, or something that can be fixed? The goal of this paper is to answer these questions and clarify the magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology. It is hoped that the results of this exercise will be helpful in advancing deliberation over the role GMOs and agricultural biotechnology should play in 21st century agriculture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available