4.5 Article

Oral heparin delivery:: Design and in vivo evaluation of a stomach-targeted mucoadhesive delivery system

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 966-973

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20311

Keywords

stomach-targeted delivery system; thiomer; low molecular weight heparin; oral absorption; bioavailability; macromolecular drug delivery; polymers; formulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is an agent of choice in the anticoagulant therapy and prophylaxis of thrombosis and coronary syndromes. However, the therapeutic use is partially limited due to a poor oral bioavailability. It was therefore the aim of this study to design and evaluate a highly efficient stomach-targeted oral delivery system for LMWH. In order to appraise the influence of the molecular weight on the oral bioavailability, mini-tablets comprising 3 kDa (279 IU) and 6 kDa (300 IU) LMWH, respectively, were generated and tested in vivo in rats. The potential of the test formulations based on thiolated polycarbophil, was evaluated in comparison to hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) as control carrier matrix. The plasma levels of LMWH after oral versus subcutaneous administration were determined in order to calculate the relative bioavailability. With the delivery system containing 3 kDa LMWH (279 IU) a relative bioavailability of 19.1% was achieved, offering a significantly (p < 0.05) better hioavailability than the control system displaying a relative bioavailability of 8.1% The 6 kDa LMWH (300 IU) formulation displayed a relative bioavailability of 10.7% in contrast to the control displaying a relative bioavailability of 2.1%. In conclusion, these results suggest that mucoadhesive thiolated polymers are a promising tool for the non-invasive stomach-targeted systemic delivery of LMWH as model for a hydrophilic macromolecular polysaccharide. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available