4.7 Article

Soluble human leukocyte antigen G expression in phase I culture media at 46 hours after fertilization predicts pregnancy and implantation from day 3 embryo transfer

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages 1410-1413

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.061

Keywords

soluble HLA-G; sHLA-G; embryo marker; implantation; IVF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare pregnancy and implantation rates after ART when embryos for day 3 embryo transfer were selected based on soluble HLA-G (sHLA-G) expression in the culture media at 46 hours after fertilization by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Private practice. Patient(s): One hundred seven patients undergoing ART aged < 39 years with normal ovarian reserve, a normal uterine cavity, and two or more embryos scoring >= 70 by the graduated embryo scoring (GES) method, transferred on day 3. Intervention(s): Patients were divided into two groups. In group A (n = 51) all embryos transferred expressed sHLA-G above the geometric mean (sHLA-G+), whereas in group B (n = 56) all embryos transferred were sHLA-G-ve. Main Outcome Measure(s): Viable pregnancy rate (patients with fetal heart activity at 8 weeks of gestation per embryo transfer procedure), and implantation rate (viable gestational sacs per total embryos transferred). Result(s): When all embryos transferred were sHLA-G+ve the pregnancy and implantation rates were 75% (38/51) and 44% (51/116), respectively, compared to 23% (13/56) and 14% (20/143) when all embryos transferred were sHLA-G-ve. Conclusion(s): Pregnancy and implantation rates after day 3 embryo transfer are improved when sHLA-G expression in phase I culture media at 46 hours after fertilization by ICSI is used prospectively as a criterion for selecting optimal embryos for transfer. ((c) 2005 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available