4.5 Article

The distribution of cyanobacteria across physical and chemical gradients in hot springs in northern Thailand

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 365-376

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.12.007

Keywords

thermophilic cyanobacteria; morphotypes; diversity; hot springs; multivariate analysis; Thailand

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We mapped the distribution of mat forming cyanobacteria along the thermal gradient from 30 to 80 degrees C, in nine hot spring districts in northern Thailand. Nineteen genera and 36 species were identified by morphometric analysis. Water temperature was the predominant determinant of community structure in the springs. The diversity of cyanobacterial morphotypes fell as temperature increased. Water chemistry (pH, alkalinity and ammonia concentration) was a much weaker descriptor of the floral similarity between the springs. The morphotypes which dominated all springs were Syneehoeoceus lividus and Syneehoeoccus sp. (> 40 and < 80 degrees C) and Phormidium boryanum (> 30 and < 60 degrees C). The occurrence of Synechococcus lividus and Synechococcus sp. in every spring at 70 degrees C or more, implied there was no regional barrier to the distribution of these highly thermophilic taxa. Conversely, there were regional differences in the diversity of mat communities growing below 60 degrees C. The most depauperate flora were in the northernmost springs (SKP, TPN, PD, JS) and the springs further south around Chiang Mai had more diverse flora, suggestive of barriers to the dispersal of some taxa. More discriminating analyses using molecular tools will be required to determine whether the ubiquitous distribution Synechoccoccus morphotypes above 60 degrees C masks a genotypic diversity, comparable to the morphotype diversity observed below 60 degrees C. (c) 2004 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available