4.5 Article

Removal of uranium(VI) from the aqueous phase by iron(II) minerals in presence of bicarbonate

Journal

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1617-1625

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.04.029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FUNMIG
  2. Excellence for Actinide Sciences (ACTI-NET) [05-13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uranium(VI) mobility in groundwater is strongly affected by sorption of mobile U(VI) species (e.g. uranyl, UO(2)(2+)) to mineral surfaces, precipitation of U(VI) compounds, such as schoepite (UO(2))(4)O(OH)(6)center dot 6H(2)O), and by reduction to U(IV), forming sparingly soluble phases (uraninite; UO(2)). The latter pathway, in particular, would be very efficient for long-term immobilization of U. In nature, Fe(II) is an important reducing agent for U(VI) because it frequently occurs either dissolved in natural waters, sorbed to matrix minerals, or structurally bound in many minerals. Redox reactions between U(VI) and Fe(II) depend not only on the availability of Fe(II) in the environment, but also on the chemical conditions in the aqueous solution. Under natural groundwater condition U(VI) forms complexes with many anionic ligands, which strongly affect its speciation. Carbonate, in particular, is known to form stable complexes with U, raising the question, if U(VI), when complexed by carbonate, can be reduced to UO(2). The goal of this study was to find out if Fe(II) when structurally bound in a mineral (as magnetite, Fe(3)O(4)) or sorbed to a mineral surface (as corundum, Al(2)O(3)) can reduce U(VI) to U(IV) in the presence of HCO(3)(-). Batch experiments were conducted under anaerobic conditions to observe U removal from the aqueous phase by the two minerals depending on HCO(3)(-) addition (1 mM), U concentration (0.01-30 mu M) and pH value (6-10). Immediately after the experiments, the mineral surfaces were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to obtain information on the redox state of U bound to the solid surfaces. XPS results gave evidence that U(VI) can be reduced both by magnetite and by corundum amended with Fe(II). In the presence of HCO(3) the amount of reduced U on the mineral surfaces increased compared to carbonate-free solutions. This can be explained by the formation of Fe(II) carbonates on the mineral surfaces which represent an easily available Fe(II) pool for the U(VI) reduction. A facilitated U(VI) reduction is also considered possible when U is present as a carbonate complex compared to non-complexed U (e.g. uranyl). (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available