3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Visual and statistical modeling of facial movement in patients with cleft lip and palate

Journal

CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 245-254

Publisher

ALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP DIVISION ALLEN PRESS
DOI: 10.1597/04-010.1

Keywords

circumoral movement; cleft impairment; dynamic analysis

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE13814-01A1, R01 DE013814] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To analyze and display facial movement data from noncleft subjects and from patients with cleft lip and palate by using a new dynamic approach. The hypothesis was that there are differences in facial movement between the patients with cleft lip and palate and the noncleft subjects. Setting: Subjects were recruited from the University of North Carolina School of Dentistry Orthodontic and Craniofacial Clinics. Patients, Participants: Sixteen patients with cleft lip and palate and eight noncleft control subjects. Interventions: Video recordings and measurements in three dimensions of facial movement. Main Outcome Measures: Principal component (PC) scores for each of six animations or movements and dynamic modeling of mean animations. Statistics: Multivariate statistics were used to test for significant differences in the PC mean scores between the patient groups and the noncleft groups. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in PC mean scores between the patient groups and the noncleft groups; however, the variability of the effect of clefting on the soft tissues during animation was noted when the noncleft data were used to establish a normal scale of movement. Compensatory movements were seen in some of the patients with cleft lip and palate, and the compensation was not unidirectional. Conclusion: Measures of mean movement differences as summarized by PC scores between patients with cleft lip and palate and noncleft subjects may be misleading because of extreme variations about the mean in the patient group that may neutralize group differences. It may be more appropriate to compare patients to a noncleft normal scale of movement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available