4.8 Article

Fabrication of well-defined PLGA scaffolds using novel microembossing and carbon dioxide bonding

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 26, Issue 15, Pages 2585-2594

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.046

Keywords

tissue scaffold; microembossing; carbon dioxide bonding; poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide); PLGA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel biologically benign technique was developed to produce three-dimensional tissue engineering scaffolds with well-defined structure. Photolithography was used to design and pattern a planar scaffold skeletal structure on a photoresist (SU-8), and a variety of microembossing processes including sacrificial layer embossing and bilayer embossing were developed to transfer the skeletal pattern to the poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) substrate as scaffold skeletons. Subcritical carbon dioxide was then introduced to assemble these skeletons to a three-dimensional scaffold at a low temperature. Compared with conventional scaffolds, which have a broad pore size distribution and varying pore geometry, these microfabricated scaffolds have a uniform and well-defined geometry and structure. This uniformity of structural parameters allows for the studies of cell attachment, spreading, and proliferation in scaffolds in a controlled and logical manner. The cytocompatibility of these microfabricated scaffolds was tested by seeding three different cell lines with different morphologies and growth patterns into these scaffolds. All three cell lines attached well to the scaffolds and grew to high densities as observed with scanning electron microscopy. This study demonstrates a controllable method to fabricate tissue scaffolds with a well-defined 3D architecture that can be used to better elucidate the effect of structure parameters such as pore geometry and pore size on tissue growth in 3D scaffolds. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available