4.5 Article

Time course of myogenic and metabolic gene expression in response to acute exercise in human skeletal muscle

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 5, Pages 1745-1752

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2004

Keywords

MRF4; Myf5; MyoD; myogenin; FAT/CD36; CPT1; HKII; PDK4

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-18409] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to examine the time course activation of select myogenic (MRF4, Myf5, MyoD, myogenin) and metabolic (CD36, CPT1, HKII, and PDK4) genes after an acute bout of resistance ( RE) or run ( Run) exercise. Six RE subjects [ 25 +/- 4 yr ( mean +/- SD), 74 +/- 14 kg, 1.71 +/- 0.11 m] and six Run subjects ( 25 +/- 4 yr, 72 +/- 5 kg, 1.81 +/- 0.07 m, 63 +/- 8 ml center dot kg(-1) center dot min(-1)) were studied. Eight muscle biopsies were taken from the vastus lateralis ( RE) and gastrocnemius ( Run) before, immediately after, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after exercise. RE increased mRNA of MRF4 (3.7- to 4.5-fold 2 - 4 h post), MyoD (5.8-fold 8 h post), myogenin (2.6- and 3.5-fold 8 - 12 h post), HKII (3.6- to 10.5-fold 2 - 12 h post), and PDK4 (14- to 26-fold 2 - 8 h post). There were no differences in Myf5, CD36, and CPT1 mRNA levels 0 - 24 h post-RE. Run increased mRNA of MyoD (5.0- to 8.0-fold), HKII (12- to 16-fold), and PDK4 (32- to 52-fold) at 8 - 12 h postexercise. There were no differences in MRF4, Myf5, myogenin, CD36 and CPT1 mRNA levels 0 - 24 h post-Run. These data indicate a myogenic and metabolic gene induction with RE and Run exercise. The timing of the gene induction is variable and generally peaks 4 - 8 h postexercise with all gene expression not significantly different from the preexercise levels by 24 h postexercise. These data provide basic information for the timing of human muscle biopsy samples for gene-expression studies involving exercise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available