4.7 Article

High serum erythropoletin level is associated with smaller infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction who undergo successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 1406-1412

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.043

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES We investigated whether a higher serum erythropoietin (EPO) level in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) subjected to successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can predict a smaller infarct size determined by creatine kinase (CK) release. BACKGROUND Erythropoietin has been shown to protect cardiomyocytes from ischemia-reperfusion injury in rodents. METHODS We prospectively studied 101 patients with first MI who received successful primary PCI within 12 h from the onset of MI. Blood samples were collected to examine the serum EPO level after the primary PCI and within 24 h from the onset of MI. RESULTS The peak CK level and cumulative CK release were significantly lower in the above-median EPO group than in the below-median EPO group. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grades and collateral grades before PCI, infarct-related coronary arteries, time to the successful reperfusion from the onset of MI, and serum creatinine levels were similar in the two EPO groups. A stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the absolute serum EPO level (mU/mI) as well as TIMI grades after PCI and preinfarction angina was an independent predictor for the cumulative CK release. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that a high endogenous EPO level can predict a smaller infarct size in patients with acute MI subjected to successful primary PCI. This might be attributed to the potentially protective effect of endogenous EPO against ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans. (c) 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available