Journal
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 234, Issue 1, Pages 123-131Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.11.011
Keywords
apoptosis; Caspases; feedback control; inhibitors of apoptosis; Smac
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Caspases are thought to be important players in the execution process of apoptosis. Inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) are able to block caspases and therefore apoptosis. The fact that a subgroup of the IAP family inhibits active caspases implies that not each cas; pase activation necessarily leads to apoptosis. In such a scenario, however, processed and enzymically active caspases should somehow be removed. Indeed, IAP-caspase complexes covalently bind ubiquitin, resulting in degradation by the 26S proteasome. Following release from mitochondria, IAP antagonists (e.g. second mitochondrial activator of caspases (Smac)) inactivate IAPs. Moreover, although pro-apoptotic factors such as irradiation or anti-cancer drugs may release Smac from mitochondria in tumor cells, high cytoplasmic survivin and ML-IAP levels might be able to neutralize it and, consequently, lAPs would further be able to bind activated caspases. Here, we propose a simple mathematical model, describing the molecular interactions between Smac deactivators, Smac, IAPs, and caspase-3, including the requirements for both induction and prevention of apoptosis, respectively. In addition, we predict a novel mechanism of caspase-3 degradation that might be particularly relevant in long-living cells. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available