4.1 Article

Effect of photoperiod and temperature on the induction of diapause in a Japanese strain of Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)

Journal

APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY AND ZOOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 17-26

Publisher

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s13355-011-0084-4

Keywords

Aphidoletes aphidimyza; Diapause; Photoperiodic response; Temperature response; Sensitive stage

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21380201] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aphidophagous gall midge Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rondani) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), a dominant natural enemy of aphids, has been used as a biological control agent in many countries to control aphids in greenhouses. As developmental arrest in diapause lowers the effectiveness of natural enemies, we studied the effect of photoperiod and temperature on the incidence of diapause in a Japanese strain of A. aphidimyza by examining diapause induction under different day-length conditions in the laboratory. The critical day length for diapause induction was determined to be 12.7 h at 20 degrees C. Diapause incidence was completely prevented at 30 degrees C even though the photoperiod used was 11L13D. We also examined diapause induction under changing temperature conditions while maintaining the critical day length (12.7L11.3D). Diapause incidence was 100% in both field and greenhouse conditions under alternating temperatures of 20/16 or 25/16 degrees C while the critical day length of 12.7 h was maintained. The Japanese strain of A. aphidimyza was sensitive to diapause entry from the first to the third noncocooned instar larval stages. Its eggs do not seem to be sensitive to diapause induction. Our results suggest that constant short-day conditions for at least four days are needed to induce diapause in the Japanese strain of A. aphidimyza.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available