4.5 Article

Mapping the neural circuit activated by alarm pheromone perception by c-Fos immunohistochemistry

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1043, Issue 1-2, Pages 145-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.02.061

Keywords

alarm pheromone; stress-induced hyperthermia; brain mapping; rat; medial amygdala; the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously reported that the alarm pheromones released from stressed male rats exaggerated both behavioral and autonomic (stress-induced hyperthermia) responses in recipient rats that were introduced into a novel environment. Subsequent experiments provided evidence that these alarm pheromones could be divided into two functionally different categories based on the site specificity and testosterone dependency of their production. However, the neural mechanisms underlying these behavioral and physiological responses remain unknown. In the present study, we examined Fos expression in 26 brain sites of the recipient rat 60 min after the exposure to the pheromone that aggravated stress-induced hyperthermia. The alarm pheromone-exposed rats showed a concurrent increase in Fos expressions in contrast to control odor-exposed rats in the anterior division lateral and medial group of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, paraventricular nucleus, dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus, anterodorsal medial, lateral and basolateral amygdaloid nucleus, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, laterodorsal tegmental nucleus, and locus cocruleus. These results provide information about the neural mechanisms in response to a nonsexual pheromone, i.e., an alarm pheromone, and suggest that the perception of the alarm pheromone is related to stress-responsive brains structures, including the hypothalamus and brainstem, as well as to the amygdaloid nuclei. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available