4.5 Article

Differential gene expression in pulmonary artery endothelial cells exposed to sickle cell plasma

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 293-298

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00246.2004

Keywords

sickle cell disease; microarray studies; cholesterol biosynthesis; angiogenesis

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL-68970-02-S1, R01-HL-68970, U54-HL-70819, K23 HL079003-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical variability in sickle cell disease (SCD) suggests a role for extra-erythrocytic factors in the pathogenesis of vasoocclusion. We hypothesized that endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction, one possible modifier of disease variability, results from induction of phenotypic changes by circulating factors. Accordingly, we analyzed gene expression in cultured human pulmonary artery ECs (HPAEC) exposed to plasma from 1) sickle acute chest syndrome (ACS) patients, 2) SCD patients at steady state, 3) normal volunteers, and 4) serum-free media, using whole genome microarrays (U133A-B GeneChip, Affymetrix). Data were analyzed by Bayesian analysis of differential gene expression (BADGE). Differential expression was defined by the probability of > 1.5 fold change in signal intensity greater than 0.999 and a predicted score of 70 - 100, measured by cross-validation. Compared with normal plasma, plasma from SCD patients (steady state) resulted in differential expression of 50 genes in HPAEC. Of these genes, molecules involved in cholesterol biosynthesis and lipid transport, the cellular stress response, and extracellular matrix proteins were most prominent. Another 58 genes were differentially expressed in HPAEC exposed to plasma from ACS patients. The pattern of altered gene expression suggests that plasma from SCD patients induces an EC phenotype which is anti-apoptotic and favors cholesterol biosynthesis. An altered EC phenotype elicited by SCD plasma may contribute to the pathogenesis of sickle vasoocclusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available