4.8 Article

Free energy landscape of A-DNA to B-DNA conversion in aqueous solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 127, Issue 18, Pages 6866-6876

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja050482k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 93577-01, R01 CA093577, R01 CA093577-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interconversion between the well-characterized A- and B-forms of DNA is a structural transition for which the intermediate states and the free energy difference between the two endpoints are not known precisely. In the present study, the difference between the Root Mean Square Distance (RMSD) from canonical A-form and B-form DNA is used as an order parameter to characterize this free energy difference using umbrella sampling molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with explicit solvent. The constraint imposed along this order parameter allows relatively unrestricted evolution of the intermediate structures away from both canonical A- and B-forms. The free energy difference between the A- and B-forms for the hexamer DNA sequence CTCGAG in aqueous solution is conservatively estimated to be at least 2.8 kcal/ mol. A continuum of intermediate structures with no well-defined local minima links the two forms. The absence of any major barriers in the free energy surface is consistent with spontaneous conversion of the A-form DNA to 13-form DNA in unconstrained simulations. The extensive sampling in the MID simulations (> 0.1 mu s) also allowed quantitative energetic characterization of local backbone conformational variables such as sugar pseudorotation angles and BI/BII state equilibria and their dependence on base identity. The absolute minimum in the calculated free energy profile corresponds closely to the crystal structure of the hexamer sequence, indicating that the present method has the potential to identify the most stable state for an arbitrary DNA sequence in water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available