4.5 Article

Ferrite-based perovskites as cathode materials for anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells Part I.: Variation of composition

Journal

SOLID STATE IONICS
Volume 176, Issue 15-16, Pages 1341-1350

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2005.03.009

Keywords

solid oxide fuel cells; SOFC; cathode; perovskite; LSCF; (La,Sr)(Co,Fe)O-3; lanthanum ferrite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The properties and the applicability of iron- and cobalt-containing perovskites were evaluated as cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) in comparison to state-of-the-art manganite-based perovskites. The materials examined were Laj(1-x-y)SrCo(0.2)Fe(0.8)O(3-delta) (x = 0.2 and 0.4; y = 0-0.05), La0.8Sr0.2FeO3-delta, La0.7Ba0.3Co0.2Fe0.8O3-delta and Ce0.05Sr0.95Co0.2FeO0.8O3-delta. The main emphasis was placed on the electrochemical properties of the materials, which were investigated on planar anode-supported SOFCs with 8 mol% yttria-stabilised zirconia (8YSZ) electrolytes. An interlayer of the composition Ce0.8Gd0.2O2-delta was placed between the electrolyte and the cathode to prevent undesired chemical reactions between the materials. The sintering temperatures of the cathodes were adapted for each of the materials to obtain similar micro structures. In comparison to the SOFCs with state-of-the-art manganite-based cathodes, SOFCs with La1-x-ySrCo0.2Fe0.8O3-delta cathodes achieved much higher current densities. Small A-site deficiency and high strontium content had a particularly positive effect on cell performance. The measured current densities of cells with these cathodes were as high as 1.76 A/cm(2) at 800 degrees C and 0.7 V, which is about twice the current density of cells with LSM/YSZ cathodes. SOFCs with La0.58Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-delta cathodes have been operated for more than 5000 h in endurance tests with a degradation of 1.0-1.5% per 1000 h. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available