4.6 Article

Role of primary active species and TiO2 surface characteristic in UV-illuminated photodegradation of Acid Orange 7

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.11.006

Keywords

photocatalysis; Acid Orange 7; initial step; scavenger; surface modification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controversy still exists over whether photocatalytic oxidation proceeds via OH center dot radicals, valence band holes, O-2(center dot-) or H2O2, In this paper, the role of these primary oxidants in the photodegradation of an azo dye, Acid Orange 7 (AO7) in UV-illuminated TiO2 suspension was investigated. Little influence of methanol or isopropanol on the degradation indicated that the oxidation was not primarily proceeding by reaction between OH center dot radicals and AO7, because alcohols could effectively scavenge OH center dot radicals. But the presence of I- (hole scavenger) significantly inhibited the degradation, thus suggesting that holes played a major role. Then, experiments carried out in acetonitrile, methanol or isopropanol solvent confirmed the major role of holes, since OH center dot radicals were minimized in dry solvent. In addition, it was suggested that O-2(center dot-) and H2O2 had a negligible effect when Cr(VI) was used as electron scavenger instead of O-2. The effects of surface modification by F- or SO42- on the initial steps of photodegradation were also investigated. The hydroxyl groups on the surface of TiO2 were replaced by F- or SO42- and there were little adsorbed AO7 molecules to be trapped by hole, so the initial process could shift progressively from hole-dominated surface reaction to homogeneous radical reaction in bulk solution. Discussion about the relationship between adsorption and photodegradation indicated that the degradation rate was not strongly affected by the actual location amount of organics on TiO2 surface. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available