4.7 Article

Reactivity of epicatechin in aqueous glycine and glucose Maillard reaction models:: Quenching of C2, C3, and C4 sugar fragments

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 53, Issue 10, Pages 4130-4135

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf050044x

Keywords

Maillard reaction; nonenzymatic browning; inhibit; epicatechin; polyphenolic; sugar fragments; reactivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanisms of how epicatechin alters the pathways of the Maillard reaction were investigated. Carbon-13 and nitrogen-15 labeling studies were utilized to define the reactivity of epicatechin with glucose, glycine, and/or reaction products in an aqueous model (pH 7, 125 degrees C for 30 min) via GC, GC/MS and HPLC/MS analysis. Quantification of the volatile reaction product isotopomers by GC/MS from a 1:1 labeled to unlabeled glucose (carbohydrate module labeling technique) plus glycine model system indicated the formation of 2,3-butanedione and acetol were primarily formed via intact C(4) and C(3) sugar fragments, whereas pyrazine, methylpyrazine, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, 2,3,5-trimethylpyrazine, and cyclotene were primarily formed via intact C(2)/C(2), C(2)/C(3), C(3)/C(3), C(3)/C(3), and C(3)/C(3) sugar fragment pairs, respectively. The formation of these seven compounds was also reported by GC analysis to be dramatically inhibited when epicatechin was added to the glucose/glycine model system (observed 9-113-fold reduction). HPLUMS analysis of both the glucose-labeled and glycine-labeled model systems with and without epicatechin indicated that epicatechin reacted directly with C(2), C(3), and C(4) sugar fragments, while epicatechin did not report any direct reactivity with glycine. In conclusion, the quenching of sugar fragmentation products via epicatechin was correlated with the observed inhibition on volatile compound formation when epicatechin was added to a glucose/glycine aqueous reaction model system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available