4.7 Review

Mesocortical dopamine neurons operate in distinct temporal domains using multimodal signaling

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages 5013-5023

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0557-05.2005

Keywords

prefrontal cortex; dopamine tone; ventral tegmental area; glutamate; in vivo recordings; reward

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA014698] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH65924, R01 MH064569, MH064569, R01 MH065924] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [14698] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vivo extracellular recording studies have traditionally shown that dopamine ( DA) transiently inhibits prefrontal cortex ( PFC) neurons, yet recent biophysical measurements in vitro indicate that DA enhances the evoked excitability of PFC neurons for prolonged periods. Moreover, although DA neurons apparently encode stimulus salience by transient alterations in firing, the temporal properties of the PFC DA signal associated with various behaviors is often extraordinarily prolonged. The present study used in vivo electrophysiological and electrochemical measures to show that the mesocortical system produces a fast non-DA-mediated postsynaptic response in the PFC that appears to be initiated by glutamate. In contrast, short burst stimulation of mesocortical DA neurons that produced transient ( < 4 s) DA release in the PFC caused a simultaneous reduction in spontaneous firing ( consistent with extracellular in vivo recordings) and a form of DA-induced potentiation in which evoked firing was increased for tens of minutes ( consistent with in vitro measurements). We suggest that the mesocortical system might transmit fast signals about reward or salience via corelease of glutamate, whereas the simultaneous prolonged DA-mediated modulation of firing biases the long-term processing dynamics of PFC networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available