4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase II study of 9-nitro-camptothecin in patients with advanced chordoma or soft tissue sarcoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 15, Pages 3597-3604

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.170

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The purpose of this trial was to assess the objective clinical response, toxicity, and time to progression of treatment with 9-Nitro-Camptothecin (9-NC) in patients with advanced chordoma, soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Patients and Methods Patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic chordoma, STS, or GIST received 9-NC 1.25 mg/m(2) orally for 5 consecutive days followed by 2 days of rest. Patients continued on therapy until disease progression, uncontrollable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Results From January 2000 to May 2003, 51 patients 0 5 chordoma, 23 STS, 13 GIST patients) enrolled. One patient (7%) with chordoma and one patient (4%) with STS had an objective response. Median time to progression was 9.9, 8.0, and 8.3 weeks for chordoma, STS, and GIST patients, respectively. Three- and 6-month progression-free survival rates were 47% and 33% for chordoma patients, 26% and 22% for STS patients, and 31% and 23% for GIST patients, respectively. Ten patients (10%) stopped study drug before disease progression secondary to Common adverse events included anemia (42 patients, seven with grade 3/4 toxicity), toxicity. leukopenia (33 patients, nine with grade 3/4 toxicity), fatigue (30 patients, three with grade 3/4 toxicity), nausea (34 patients, six with grade 3/4 toxicity), and diarrhea (28 patients, five with grade 3/4 toxicity). Conclusion 9-NC has modest activity in delaying progression in patients with unresectable or metastatic chordoma. 9-NC is associated with moderate toxicity and shows little benefit in patients with advanced STS and GIST. (c) 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available