4.8 Article

Comparative and sensitive analysis for parabolic trough solar collectors with a detailed Monte Carlo ray-tracing optical model

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 559-572

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.001

Keywords

Parabolic trough solar collector; Monte Carlo ray-tracing; Comparative analysis; Geometric parameter; Sensitive analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51306149]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Education [20120201130006, 113055A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the numerical results of the comparative and sensitive analysis for different parabolic trough solar collector (PTC) systems under different operating conditions, expecting to optimize the PTC system of better comprehensive characteristics and optical performance or to evaluate the accuracy required for future constructions. A more detailed optical model was developed from a previously proposed unified Monte Carlo ray-tracing (MCRT) model. Numerical results were compared with the reference data and good agreements were obtained, proving that the model and the numerical results are reliable. Then the comparative and sensitive analyses for different PTC systems or different geometric parameters under different possible operating conditions were carried out by this detailed optical model. From the numerical results it is revealed that the ideal comprehensive characteristics and optical performance of the PTC systems are very different from some critical points determined by the divergence phenomenon of the non-parallel solar beam, which can also be well explained by the theoretical analysis results. For different operating conditions, the PTC systems of different geometric parameters have different levels of sensitivity to different optical errors, but the optical accuracy requirements from different geometric parameters of the whole PTC system are always consistent. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available