4.7 Article

Representative sampling for reliable data analysis: Theory of Sampling

Journal

CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS
Volume 77, Issue 1-2, Pages 261-277

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.09.013

Keywords

Theory of Sampling; TOS; sampling practice; data analysis reliability; sampling in chemometrics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Theory of Sampling (TOS) provides a description of all errors involved in sampling of heterogeneous materials as well as all necessary tools for their evaluation, elimination and/or minimization. This tutorial elaborates on-and illustrates-selected central aspects of TOS. The theoretical aspects are illustrated with many practical examples of TOS at work in typical scenarios, presented to yield a general overview. TOS provides a full scientific definition of the concept of sampling correctness, an attribute of the sampling process that must never be compromised. For this purpose the Fundamental Sampling Principle (FSP) also receives special attention. TOS provides the first complete scientific definition of sampling representativeness. Only correct (unbiased) mass reduction will ensure representative sampling. It is essential to induct scientific and technological professions in the TOS regime in order to secure the necessary reliability of. samples (which must be representative, from the primary sampling onwards), analysis (which will not mean anything outside the miniscule analytical volume without representativity ruling all mass reductions involved, also in the laboratory) and data analysis (data do not exist in isolation of their provenance). The Total Sampling Error (TSE) is by far the dominating contribution to all analytical endeavours, often 100+ times larger than the Total Analytical Error (TAE). We present a summarizing set of only seven Sampling Unit Operations (SUOs) that fully cover all practical aspects of sampling and provides a handy toolbox for samplers, engineers, laboratory and scientific personnel. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available