4.8 Article

Greenhouse gas intensity of palm oil produced in Colombia addressing alternative land use change and fertilization scenarios

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 958-967

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.010

Keywords

Carbon footprint; Carbon stock change; Fertilization; Global warming; Palm oil biodiesel; Vegetable oils

Funding

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) [MIT/SET/0014/2009, PTDC/SEN-TRA/117251/2010]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/60328/2009]
  3. R&D Project EMSURE (Energy and Mobility for Sustainable Regions) [CENTRO 07 0224 FEDER 002004]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/60328/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main goal of this article is to assess the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of palm oil produced in a specific plantation and mill in Colombia. A comprehensive evaluation of the implications of alternative land use change (LUC) scenarios (forest, shrubland, savanna and cropland conversion) and fertilization schemes (four synthetic and one organic nitrogen-fertilizer) was performed. A sensitivity analysis to field nitrous oxide emission calculation, biogas management options at mill, time horizon considered for global warming and multifunctionality approach were also performed. The results showed that the GHG intensity of palm oil greatly depends on the LUC scenario. Significant differences were observed between the LUC scenarios (-3.0 to 5.3 kg CO(2)eq kg(-1) palm oil). The highest result is obtained if tropical rainforest is converted and the lowest if palm is planted on previous cropland, savanna and shrubland, in which almost all LUC from Colombian oil palm area expansion occurred between 1990 and 2009. Concerning plantation and oil extraction, it was shown that field nitrous oxide emissions and biogas management options have a high influence on GHG emissions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available