4.8 Article

Castor plant for biodiesel, biogas, and ethanol production with a biorefinery processing perspective

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 14-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.005

Keywords

Alkaline pretreatment; Biodiesel; Biogas; Castor plant; Ethanol

Funding

  1. Institute of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whole parts of castor plant, as a non-edible energy crop, were used for multiple biofuels production. Extracted castor oil was used for biodiesel production by transesterification, whereas the castor plant residues, i.e., stem, seed cake, and leaves, were employed for ethanol and biogas production. Effects of operating conditions, including methanol to oil ratio, temperature, and reaction time on biodiesel production yield were investigated. The optimum biodiesel yield was 88.2%, obtained at 0.4:1 methanol to oil mass ratio at 40 degrees C for 90 min. This yield corresponded to 155 g biodiesel per kg castor plant. In addition, pretreatment using 8% w/v NaOH at 0 and 100 degrees C for 30 and 60 min was applied to improve ethanol and biogas yields. The best results for both enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) were obtained after alkali pretreatment at 100 degrees C for 60 min for all plant residues. The highest ethanol production yield achieved from pretreated castor stem was as high as 82.2%, corresponding to 63 g ethanol per kg castor plant. In the case of biogas production, alkali pretreatment enhanced the methane production yield from castor stem; however, it could not improve the production yield of castor seed cake and leaves. Furthermore, untreated castor seed cake had the highest methane production yield of 252.1 mug VS, equal to 68.2 L per kg of castor plant. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available